Exile 7/The 22 October 2001 declaration

MONDAY, 22 OCTOBER 2001

Six thousand boxes of green tea, six hundred packets of dried bean curd, sixty “Final Plans” and six Exile essays later I’m still here, behind my computer, trying to write about exactly why I am in “exile”, and about what I am going to do next.

(Should I now go into detail about my new post Belonging & Commitment theory? Should I talk about the book projects I’ve done this year, and the stories I want to write? Should I talk about the fact that I can already play Level C songs on my keyboard, and that it took me twenty minutes to learn how to play Battle Hymn of the Republic from memory? Should I talk about all the people I’ve met over the past few weeks? Should I save a line about the Boney M Gold CD I bought with the first money I earned as a freelance writer? Should I talk with clever twists about how I feel it is my moral duty to go and help my parents with their business? Should I neatly lay out in detail the current range of plans, with columns for advantages and disadvantages? Should I explain how I can pay off all my student loans if I stay here for another X number of months? How I can take my blue guitar and a bunch of books with me when I go home in April, and at the end of August – when my loans are paid off – relocate myself lock, stock and rest of the books to the farmhouse outside of Pongola? Or how I can return to South Africa at the end of February without a penny to my name, in the good faith that “everything will work out”? How about the latest one? Yes, ever heard of how they’re looking for teachers in London? How they pay something like £100 a day? Can I talk about how I can pay off all my debt in possibly a year’s time, and during holidays visit any European city or any First World War battlefield? How nice it would be to regularly see my older sister, and also to visit my parents and my younger sister more often? Is it really necessary to annex yet another exile essay with plans, visions, dreams, and reality? Or can I just say, “Howzit? Woof.”)

“Uhm … test-test, one-two-three-four … can anybody hear me? I think I’m going back to South Africa at the end of February next year on a one-way ticket, register at that teacher’s agency, and at the end of April, after [M] and that other fellow’s wedding, escape, uh … fly to London, and then pull my rear through three months of British substitute teaching, and then go to Berlin for a week … or visit a First World War battlefield. That’s all.”

______________________

Workers from ancient times

TUESDAY, 7 AUGUST 2001

In the Middle Ages and antiquity, how did the powers of the day retain the labourers who worked their land?

Slavery was one way. Feudalism entailed a relationship between the landowner and the ones who worked the soil where the latter were forced to work in exchange for the landowner’s protection. There was also indentured servitude. With all these systems the labourers were tied to the land where their labour was required by laws that favoured the landowner, and by measures such as tax, which kept the tillers of the land poor and dependent on their masters.

How are people today bound to the “land” where their labour or service is required? By amongst other things cheap credit and long-term pay-back options: monthly income minus payments on products that are already in use – like a new living room set, or a car, that leaves the average citizen with insufficient money to “get away”.

Of course, many do get away, and many never fall in. There are drop-outs, criminals, and people who wander around in other countries for years earning money in any way they can. As long as a certain percentage of the population can be bound to the “land”, though, the rest can be written off – or used at a later stage, like the drop-out who becomes a musician or a writer and who then provides entertainment or comfort for those in bondage.

It is important to note that this situation is fluid. People make their own choices at the end of the day. So I’m not implying large-scale manipulation, or sinister behind-closed-doors planning … no wait, manipulation does occur. As many people as possible have to be reached, and “turned” …

~ From the Purple Notebook

______________________

Almost the end

THURSDAY, 5 JULY 2001

I almost killed myself last night with a toy gun.

For the past three days, I’ve been camping out on my living room floor, with one eye on the TV and the other on my book on the history of the KGB. The whole purpose of this exercise was an attempt to make crucial decisions about my life, and a possible future. At one stage I stretched out to a small cabinet – conveniently accessible from a seated position – to get a packet of headache tablets. Searching for the tablets, my fingers touched the toy gun I had acquired a few months ago in a moment of boredom. The motivation behind the purchase was to amuse myself – to try and shoot small holes in a few items in my apartment, whenever my grey matter reached boiling point. The headache tablets were required for this very reason.

An hour or two after I had discovered the toy, my older sister telephoned from London. Within the first few seconds of the conversation I mentioned, to her annoyance, that I always think of her when I try to sort out what the next step in my life ought to be. She had no blotch of idle months on her professional reputation, I reminded her; she had made the right decisions at the right times, and her life in the last half decade had shown a steady upward curve. Compared with her relatively straight path to success, I have taken a more uncharted route.

Wise as she is, she advised me not to waste time brooding over the past, and to not concern myself too much about “bad decisions” I have taken over the years. I sensed a younger-brother-who-have-messed-up-and-older-sister-who-tries–to-show-him-the-way argument. The result was inevitable: I had to defend my seeming lack of direction.

And that’s exactly what it is – apparent lack of direction. I’m convinced there has been a purpose behind everything in my life to this point. I explained to her that I needed the last five years to sort out what life is about, what I wanted to do with my life, and perhaps most importantly, how to reconcile the latter with the necessity of a regular income.

Our conversation was cut short when she had to answer another call (she was calling from her office). I spent the next five minutes in deep contemplation about the middle class ideology that dictates that any person older than 24 who are not making money, must necessarily be classified as a “loser”.

But I know better than to underestimate the intelligence of middle class citizens, or their ability to tolerate divergent views on life. For example, they don’t expect everybody to work in an office – they’re not that narrow-minded! They do after all have their heroes who are rock stars and writers and actors. Of course, most of these people make money, and in some cases lots of it. So much more reason to idealise them.

When my sister phoned back, I wasted no time proceeding with the defence of my unique perspective on life. She confessed to being a little confused, but also demonstrated sincere sympathy. “Why don’t you come to England?” she finally offered her standard advice of many years. I explained that I am currently working on a master plan, that I’m contemplating returning to South Africa at the end of the year, and that I need to make decisions on these issues before I can consider something like a holiday. Whether she realised that I was intentionally being vague and that I tried to create the impression of being someone who knows where he will be at his next birthday, I can’t say.

The conversation started to wind down. We expressed the mutual hope that everything will go well with the other and said goodbye. I kept staring at the floor, with no particular thoughts to entertain or comfort myself.

The next moment light from the TV reflected on the toy pistol. To demonstrate displeasure about my eternal confusion, I picked up the toy, pressed the cold plastic barrel against my sweating forehead and pulled the trigger. Nothing, as I expected. I walked over to the cabinet and managed to extract a few of the hard plastic pellets from the cluttered drawer, excited over the distraction a duel with the cereal box will provide. In an attempt to extricate the magazine, I accidentally pulled the trigger.

To my surprise and shock – considering that I had pressed the thing against my forehead just seconds before, a barrage of pellets exploded from the barrel. In a scene reminiscent of a Wild West shootout the pellets first hit the hot water geyser, a few metres from where I was standing, transfixed, and then they ricochet into the bathroom. After several bounces, the pellets came to rest in the bathtub.

“I could have killed myself,” I mumbled nervously at my reflection in the mirror.

A few moments later I came to my senses. What was really the possibility that a small, hard plastic pellet could go through my scalp and penetrate my skull to entrench itself in my confused brain? The reasonable conclusion was then made that I could have hurt myself, but that fatal consequences were unlikely.

It was only about an hour later that I thought of the short news story that might have appeared in a local newspaper, had I ended up in a hospital to have a small plastic pellet surgically removed from my forehead: “A thirty-year-old man unsuccessfully attempted suicide late last night with a toy pistol, after a telephone conversation with his career-oriented older sister. A small plastic pellet got stuck in his forehead because of the attempt, and the man was admitted to the emergency room shortly after to have it removed. A nurse said that while he was in a stable condition, the physical and emotional scars from the incident would probably be visible until he hit his midlife crisis in a decade or so.”

Convinced that I had been given a second chance, I threw the toy gun back in the drawer, and there and then swore off violence as a way of finding my way in life. I collected the scattered remains of the almost cursed pellets, and while doing so I could swear I heard the cereal box moving out ever so slightly from behind the coffee bottle.

______________________

On “Hearts” and life

MONDAY, 18 JUNE 2001

Microsoft Hearts in Windows 7

My strategy for the card game “Hearts” is on the face of it inconsistent with the goal of the game. It looks as if I am heading for self-destruction – just for the sake of entertaining myself while the other players are playing a serious game. By the time the others realise that I am winning a game in which they did not see me as a serious competitor it’s too late. Their attempts to save their positions are already doomed, and I’m on the way to a brilliant victory, achieved in an unorthodox manner.

However, it should be noted that I do not follow this unconventional strategy with each round. Once I see I am not going to win a specific round playing my way, I change my strategy. So, I am pragmatic enough not to defeat my real purpose for the sake of being different.

This approach to the game takes guts, and almost excessive levels of confidence. You also have to accept that you will lose from time to time, and that such results should be treated with as much grace as a victory.

At the end it can be said that a victory achieved in your own way and against the expectations of the other players is much more fulfilling than merely winning the game according to both the spoken and unspoken rules and conventions.

If, however, you lose time and again by following your own unorthodox methods, it is usually a good idea to reconsider your primary goal, as well as your methods. The illusion of self-destruction is after all – and this should never be forgotten – supposed to be only an illusion.

______________________

How the forces dance

FRIDAY, 1 JUNE 2001

That everything revolves around power is one of the most important things I’ve learned on my path to adulthood. This truth applies not only to the political and economic fields, it is just as valid in the arena of personal relationships.

Any person who has ever been lucky enough – or unlucky, as is sometimes the case – to have been in an intimate relationship could tell you that both parties always knew where they stood in the balance of power. In the ideal relationship both parties are of course equal, even if one is sometimes in a better emotional state than the other, and therefore better able to dictate matters for the moment. But the fact that the party in better mood changes every now and then confirms the basic equality of the two parties.

This principle also applies to friendships. There may be times when one friend is more in control of a situation, and more confident of him- or herself. In such cases, the other friend almost instinctively takes the submissive position. These roles may change as soon as the topic of discussion changes, or when a situation develops in which one person is more comfortable, or that he can approach with more confidence.

The same phenomenon also manifests in subtle ways in social intercourse between strangers. When two people meet for the first time, say at a barbecue or at a drinking and dancing event, the brain undertakes a speedy profiling process. Facts are sought and arranged in a preliminary understanding of the balance of power. Is the person friend or foe? Is he cool, or is he a loser? Is she someone whose name I should remember, or should I give her a limp handshake while I look over her shoulder for someone else who could pique my interest?

Depending on the initial answers to these questions, we decide where we stand with the stranger in question. If the person is considered a non-threatening potential friend who gives the impression that he or she knows what words to use in what context, then the next set of questions is sent to the Supreme Organ: Should I treat him/her as an equal, or as someone I wouldn’t mind dragging along as a fan? Or, should I try my best to win this person’s favour because, a) the person knows more than I do, b) has more experience than me, c) has something that I want, or d) I regard the person as my superior for all three reasons, and a few additional ones?

You might think that this whole thought process takes up most of a minute, but in many cases these questions have already been answered by the time the handshake is done, or the heads have stopped nodding. The factors that determine the answers include appearance, the intensity of a smile, the enthusiasm or lack thereof when the other person is greeted, people you or the other person are with when you are introduced to each other, or any information that the person knew about you before they met you, or information you had about them.

Sometimes it is possible that an initial weak view of you changes as soon as the other person become privy to certain information about you. If the person finds out, for example, that despite your eccentric appearance, you are, let’s just say, financially very comfortable, you might just find an immediate change in attitude on your return from the bathroom.

Of course, the opposite can also happen. You may reckon you have left a lasting impression with the fine synchronisation between appearance and fantastic myths you have spread about yourself, but by the third time you see someone who initially fawned over you, you might find to your dismay that the person has since found a stronger figure to cosy up to. Or maybe you leaned too heavily on your anecdote about the time when you and a member of the dethroned Burmese royal family had fled through the jungle of Vietnam, only to find you are in Thailand and that he held you responsible for the fact that he had malaria. “Since when does everyone have stories like these?” you’ll ask yourself as you search the room for a new group of people to impress.

It is, unfortunately, not only the untouchables of India who are struggling with a caste system. All communities have hierarchies and classes that crisscross each other. Everyone, from the richest to the poorest, from the hippest accountant to the most boring pop star have to cope with keeping up with what defines their place on the power hierarchy in the environments in which they display themselves.

Someone should invent a mist that can be sprayed over a social gathering that would reveal the true opinions and levels of respect that people have for those around them. A few secret admirers might be exposed, but the chances are much better that some bloated egos will be pricked into nothingness.

______________________